Almrey v. Mayorkas

United States District Court for the Eastern District of California

Almrey v. Mayorkas

Trial Court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 NAFEE ALMREY, Case No. 1:23-cv-01699-KES-EPG 11 Plaintiff, 12 V. ORDER RE: NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE 13 ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, et al., (ECF No. 15) 14 Defendants. 15 16 17 . . On May 6, 2025, Plaintiff filed a notice of voluntary dismissal without prejudice under 18 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)G) as no Defendant has yet served either an answer or 19 motion for summary judgment. (ECF No. 15). 20 Accordingly, in light of the voluntary dismissal, this action has been terminated, Fed. R. 21 | Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i), and has been dismissed without prejudice. See Wilson v. City of San Jose, 22 |

111 F.3d 688, 692

(9th Cir. 1997). The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate any 23 | pending dates and deadlines and to close the case. 44 | IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 | Dated: _ May 7, 2025 [spe ey — 26 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 27 28

Reference

Status
Unknown