1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MONTEL PARKER, No. 2:24-cv-2718 DAD CKD P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 STANTON CORRECTIONAL FACILTIY, 15 Defendant. 16

17 On February 4, 2025, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed with leave to amend. Plaintiff 18 was warned that failure to file an amended complaint before the expiration of the deadline for 19 doing so would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed without prejudice. The 20 time for filing an amended complaint has expired. Plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint. 21 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without 22 prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 23 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 24 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of

(b)(l). Within fourteen days 25 after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections 26 with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings 27 and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified 28 1] || time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. YIst,

2 | (9th Cir. 1991). 3 | Dated: May 13, 2025 Card Kt | / 4 L , ag. — 4 CAROLYNK.DELANEY 5 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 6 7 8] 1 9 park2718.fta 10 1] 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28