Ludwig v. Hill

United States District Court for the Southern District of California

Ludwig v. Hill

Trial Court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 KENNETH JAMES LUDWIG, Case No.: 3:25-cv-01144-RBM-DDL CDCR #BU-3868 12 ORDER DISMISSING HABEAS Petitioner, 13 PETITION WITHOUT PREJUDICE v. 14 [Doc. 1] JAMES HILL, Warden, 15 Respondent. 16 17 18 On May 5, 2025, Petitioner Kenneth James Ludwig (“Petitioner”), a state prisoner 19 incarcerated at the Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility in San Diego, California, 20 proceeding pro se, filed a Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 21 § 2241 (“Habeas Petition”) and paid the $5.00 filing fee. (Doc. 1.) Petitioner seeks a 22 modification of his state criminal sentence to allow for compassionate release from state 23 custody. (Id. at 2–3.) 24 Petitioner argues that federal courts have authority to order compassionate release 25 from custody. (Doc. 1 at 2 (citing United States v. Zukerman,

451 F.Supp.3d 329

(S.D.N.Y. 26 2020)).) However, Congress only authorized federal courts to grant compassionate release 27 to federal prisoners when “extraordinary and compelling reasons” warrant a reduction in 28 sentence, see

18 U.S.C. § 3582

(c)(1)(A)(i), and Petitioner is not a federal inmate serving a 1 || federal sentence. 2 Further, because Petitioner is a state prisoner attacking the validity of a state 3 || sentence, he may not proceed under

28 U.S.C. § 2241

; he may only proceed with a habeas 4 action in federal court under

28 U.S.C. § 2254

. See White v. Lambert,

370 F.3d 1002

, 5 || 1006-07 (9th Cir. 2004) (explaining that

28 U.S.C. § 2254

is the proper jurisdictional basis 6 ||for a habeas petition brought by an individual in state custody pursuant to a state court 7 || judgment). 8 Accordingly, the Court DISMISSES Petitioner’s Habeas Petition without 9 || prejudice.! 10 IT IS SO ORDERED. 11 ||}|DATE: May 14, 2025 12 Kept Baertasdls, Notting 2 13 ON. RUTH BERMGDEZ! MONTENEGRO UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 | 27 ||! The Court notes that Petitioner filed a habeas petition pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 2254

the ag || Same day he filed the instant Habeas Petition. (See Case No. 3:25-cv-01151-AJB-KSC, Doc. 1.)

Reference

Status
Unknown