Ruiz De Martinez v. Aramark Services, Inc.

6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA MARIA RUIZ DE MARTINEZ, Case No. 1:24-cv-00625-EPG Plaintiff, ORDER RE: NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY 10 DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE OF v. ONLY DEFENDANT DEGNAN’S 11 KITCHEN | ARAMARK SERVICES, INC., et al., (ECF No. 26) 13 Defendants.

Is On May 15, 2025, Plaintiff filed a notice of voluntary dismissal, stating as follows: 16 WHEREAS, Defendant, DEGNAN’S KITCHEN has not filed an answer or a 7 motion for summary judgment in this action; and no cross-claim or counter-claim has been filed against Defendant DEGNAN’S KITCHEN in this action.

18 NOW, THEREFORE, Plaintiff, MARIA E. RUIZ DE MARTINEZ, hereby 19 dismisses this action with respect to Defendant, DEGNAN’S KITCHEN only, without prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)Q).

20 | (ECF No. 26, p. 1).

21 Accordingly, in light of the notice, the case against Defendant Degnan’s Kitchen has | ended and is dismissed without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(@); Wilson v. City of | San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to | terminate only Defendant Degnan’s Kitchen from the docket.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

26| Dated: _ May 16, 2025 [sf hey —— UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE