1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JAMES ONEAL BELVINS, JR., No. 2:24-cv-02077-DJC-EFB (PC) 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 PLACER COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY OFFICE, et al., 15 Defendants. 16

17 Plaintiff, a county jail inmate, proceeds without counsel in an action brought under 42

. This proceeding was referred to this court by Local Rule 302 pursuant to 28

(b)(1). 20 On February 20, 2025, the court screened plaintiff’s complaint pursuant to

1915A. ECF No. 6. The court dismissed the complaint for failure to state a claim and granted 22 plaintiff thirty days in which to file an amended complaint to cure the deficiencies.

The 23 screening order warned plaintiff that failure to comply could result in a recommendation that this 24 action be dismissed. 25 Although it appears from the file that plaintiff’s copy of the order was returned, plaintiff 26 was properly served. It is the plaintiff’s responsibility to keep the court apprised of a current 27 address at all times. Pursuant to Local Rule 182(f), service of documents at the record address of 28 1 | the party is fully effective. 2 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without 3 || prejudice for failure to state a claim. 4 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 5 || assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of

(b)(1). Within fourteen days 6 || after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections 7 || with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings 8 || and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified 9 || time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Yist,

10 | (9th Cir. 1991). Data BBE 12 || Dated: May 19, 2025 "lli¢l 7 -LACA EDMUND F. BRENNAN 13 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28