(PC) McMillion v. Doer

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SKYLER MCMILLION, No. 1:24-cv-01557-KES-SAB (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS AND DENYING 13 v. PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION J. DOER, et al., Defendants.

16 Docs. 16, 18 18 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights complaint pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Federal Narcotics Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). This matter was referred to a United States magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

22 On March 5, 2025, the magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations recommending that plaintiff’s motion for class certification be denied. Doc. 18. The findings and recommendations were served on plaintiff and contained notice that any objections thereto were to be filed within fourteen (14) days after service. Id. at 2. Plaintiff did not file objections and the time to do so has passed.

27 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), this Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the file, the Court finds the findings and || recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

2 Accordingly: 3 1. The findings and recommendations issued on March 5, 2025, Doc. 18, are ADOPTED IN 4 FULL; and 5 2. Plaintiff's motion for class certification filed on March 3, 2025, Doc. 16, is DENIED. g | IT ISSO ORDERED. _ 9 Dated: _ May 21, 2025 4h | | 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE