Elliott Nash v. K.W. Prunty

United States District Court for the Central District of California

Elliott Nash v. K.W. Prunty

Trial Court Opinion

CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL

Case No. 2:25-cv-01168-SVW-SK Date: May 22, 2025 Title: Elliott Nash v. K.W. Prunty, et al.

Present: The Honorable STEPHEN V. WILSON, U.S. District Judge

Paul Cruz Not Reported Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder

Attorneys Present for Plaintiff: Attorneys Present for Defendants: None Present None Present

Proceedings (In Chambers):

On March 18, 2025, the Court postponed ruling on Plaintiff’s request to proceed in forma pauperis because it was unclear whether he was a civil detainee or a prisoner, which affected whether he would still be required to pay the filing fee even if he qualified for in forma pauperis status. Dkt. 4 (citing Page v. Torrey,

201 F.3d 1136

(9th Cir. 2000)). Accordingly, the Court directed Plaintiff to file a short statement explaining his custody status and warned that if he did not comply within 30 days, the case would be dismissed without prejudice. Dkt. 4. To date, Plaintiff has not responded to the Court’s Order. Accordingly, this action is DISMISSED without prejudice. See, e.g., Allen v. United States Dist. Ct. Dist. of Nevada,

2022 WL 16702429

, at *2 (D. Nev. Oct. 25, 2022) (dismissing § 1983 action where inmate failed to pay full filing fee or qualify for in forma pauperis status). All other pending matters are TERMINATED. IT IS SO ORDERED. CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL

Case No. 2:25-cv-01168-SVW-SK Date: May 22, 2025 Title: Elliott Nash v. K.W. Prunty, et al.

Reference

Status
Unknown