1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ANTOINE DESHAWN BARNES, No. 2:25-cv-0560 DJC CKD P 12 Petitioner, 13 v. ORDER 14 E. STONE, 15 Respondent. 16 17 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a petition for a writ of 18 habeas corpus under

. The matter was referred to a United States 19 Magistrate Judge pursuant to

(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On March 31, 2025, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations 21 herein which were served on petitioner and which contained notice to Petitioner that 22 any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen 23 days. Petitioner has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations. 24 The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United 25 States,

(9th Cir. 1979). The Magistrate Judge’s conclusions of law 26 are reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist.,

, 454 27 (9th Cir. 1983). Having reviewed the file, the Court finds the findings and 28 recommendations to be supported by the record and by the Magistrate Judge’s 1 | analysis. 2 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 3 1. The findings and recommendations filed March 31, 2025 are adopted in full; 4 2. Petitioner's third amended petition for a writ of habeas corpus is summarily 5 | dismissed; and 6 3. This case is closed. 7 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. 9 | Dated: _May 23, 2025 “Darel J CL bratter— Hon. Daniel alabretta 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28