United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, 2025

(SS) Valencia v. Commissioner of Social Security

(SS) Valencia v. Commissioner of Social Security
United States District Court for the Eastern District of California · Decided May 28, 2025
(SS) Valencia v. Commissioner of Social Security

Trial Court Opinion

1 Jared Walker (SB#269029) P.O. Box 1777 Orangevale, CA 95662 T: (916) 476-5044 F: (916) 476-5064 [email protected] Attorney for Plaintiff, FRANCISCO VALENCIA 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA FRANCISCO VALENCIA, Case No.: 2:24-cv-2847-JDP 10 Plaintiff, STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER 11 v. FOR THE AWARD OF ATTORNEY FEES PURSUANT TO THE EQUAL ACCESS TO FRANK BISIGNANO, JUSTICE ACT, 28 U.S.C. § 2412 Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, 14 Defendant.

16 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties through their undersigned counsel, subject to the approval of the Court, that Plaintiff be awarded attorney fees and expenses in the above-entitled action in the amount of $7,500.00 under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d). This amount represents compensation for all legal services and expenses incurred on behalf of Plaintiff by counsel in connection with this civil action.

21 Upon the Court’s issuance of an order granting EAJA fees to Plaintiff, the government will determine the issue of Plaintiff’s assignment of EAJA fees to Plaintiff’s attorney. Pursuant to Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586, 597-598 (2010), the ability to honor the assignment will depend on if the fees are subject to any offset allowed under the United States Department of the Treasury’s Offset Program. After the order for EAJA fees is entered, the government will promptly determine whether they are subject to any offset.

27 Fees shall be made payable to Plaintiff, but if the Department of the Treasury determines that Plaintiff does not owe a federal debt, then the government will cause the payment of fees to be made directly to Plaintiff’s attorney, LAW OFFICE OF JARED T. WALKER, P.C., pursuant to the assignment executed by Plaintiff. Any payments made to Plaintiff will be delivered to JARED T.

3 WALKER.

4 This stipulation constitutes a settlement of Plaintiff’s request for EAJA attorney fees and does not constitute an admission of liability on the part of defendant under the EAJA or otherwise.

6 Payment of the agreed amount will constitute a complete release from, and bar to, any and all claims that Plaintiff and/or Plaintiff’s attorney, including LAW OFFICE OF JARED T. WALKER, P.C., may have relating to EAJA attorney fees in connection with this action.

9 This award is without prejudice to the rights of Plaintiff’s counsel to seek Social Security attorney fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b), subject to the savings clause provisions of the EAJA.

11 Dated: May 27, 2025 Respectfully submitted, 12 /s/ Jared Walker JARED WALKER, 13 Attorney for Plaintiff SO STIPULATED: 15 MICHELE BECKWITH Acting United States Attorney

18 By: /s/ *Erin Jurrens ERIN JURRENS 19 (*authorized by e-mail on 5/27/2025) Special Assistant United States Attorney Attorneys for Defendant

1 ORDER 2 Based upon the parties’ Stipulation for Award of Attorney Fees pursuant to the Equal Access || to Justice Act (EAJA), 4 IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff is awarded $7,500.00 in fees and expenses under 28 U.S.C. § 5 2412(d), inclusive of all amounts claimed, subject to and in accordance with the terms of the parties’ || foregoing Stipulation.

8 IT IS SO ORDERED.

9 ( q oy — Dated: _ May 28, 2025 ow—— 10 JEREMY D,. PETERSON UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE □□□ CTIDIT ATIARN ANTI DDADAGCENADRED UAD

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.