Errol Joseph Scorza v. Attorney Office of the Attorney General for the State of California

United States District Court for the Central District of California

Errol Joseph Scorza v. Attorney Office of the Attorney General for the State of California

Trial Court Opinion

1 2

3

4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8

9 10 ERROL JOSEPH SCORZA, IV, Case No. 2:24-cv-11221-PA-SSC 11 Petitioner, ORDER ACCEPTING 12 v. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF 13 OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY UNITED STATES 14 GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND DENYING CERTIFICATE OF 15 CALIFORNIA, et al., APPEALABILITY 16 Respondents. 17

18 Pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 636

the Court has reviewed the petition, 19 all of the records herein, and the Report and Recommendation of United 20 States Magistrate Judge to which no objections were filed. The Court 21 accepts the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge in the 22 Report and Recommendation. 23 IT IS ORDERED that judgment be entered dismissing this action 24 without prejudice to refiling if authorized by the Ninth Circuit. 25 Further, the Court finds that Petitioner has not made a 26 substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right or that the 27 1 | appealability will not issue in this action. See

28 U.S.C. § 2253

(c)(2); 2 | Fed. R. App. P. 22(b); Miller-El v. Cockrell,

537 U.S. 322, 336

(2008); 3 | Slack v. McDaniel,

529 U.S. 473, 484

(2000). ht C4 5 | DATED: June 2, 2025 6 PERCY ANDERSON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Reference

Status
Unknown