1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 |} FERNANDO GASTELUM, Case No.: 25-cv-747-RSH-DEB 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER ON JOINT MOTION TO 14 |} MMPR EL CENTRO HOLDINGS LLC, DISMISS 15 Defendant. 16 [ECF No. 11] 17 8 Before the Court is the Parties’ Joint Motion to Dismiss. ECF No. 11. The Motion satisfies the requirements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) and. is effective on filing. See Wilson v. City of San Jose,

, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). The action, in its entirety, is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Each Party is to bear its own fees and costs. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the case. IT IS SO ORDERED. ‘ NI Dated: June 2, 2025 [Reta © loon 26 Hon. Robert S. Huie 27 United States District Judge 28