1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MOHAMEDSALEEM MUBARAK ALI, No. 2:24-cv-0654 DJC AC PS PARVEEN BANU MOHAMMED BABU, 12 Plaintiffs, 13 ORDER v. 14 SAN FRANCISCO ASYLUM OFFICE 15 and UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICE, 16 Defendants. 17

18 Plaintiffs proceed in this action in pro per. The matter was referred to a United 19 States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). 20 On March 31, 2025, the Magistrate Judge filed Findings and 21 Recommendations recommending dismissal for failure to prosecute for failure to 22 effectuate service. ECF No. 19. In light of Plaintiffs’ representation in their objections 23 to the Findings and Recommendations (ECF No. 20) that Plaintiffs did not receive the 24 Magistrate Judge’s March 18, 2025 Order (ECF No. 17) with sufficient time to comply, 25 the Court permitted Plaintiffs an additional 21 days to comply with the March 18, 2025 26 Order, through and including May 27, 2025 (ECF No. 22). The Court noted that failure 27 to comply with that Order would result in the matter being dismissed for failure to 28 1 | prosecute without further Findings and Recommendations. Plaintiffs have failed to 2 || comply with this Court’s Order and have not yet effectuated service. Having 3 | considered the factors in Ferdick v. Bonzelet,

, the Court finds 4 | that dismissal is appropriate. 5 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 6 1. This action is dismissed, without prejudice, for lack of prosecution and for 7 failure to comply with the court's order. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); Local Rule 8 110; and 9 2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case. 10 11 12 IT IS SO ORDERED. 13 | Dated: _May 30, 2025 “Darel A CDbnetto Hon. Daniel alabretta 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28