1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JOSHUA R. GOOD, No. 2:24-cv-01503-DJC-EFB (PC) 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 PATTY PEARSON, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, incarcerated at Atascadero State Hospital and proceeding pro se, has 18 filed this civil rights action seeking relief under

. The matter was 19 referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to

(b)(1)(B) and 20 Local Rule 302. 21 On March 17, 2025, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations 22 herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that 23 any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen 24 days. Plaintiff has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations. 25 In accordance with the provisions of

(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 26 304, this Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully 27 reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the findings and recommendations to be 28 supported by the record and by proper analysis. In addition, the Court has 1 | considered the factors described in Ferdik v. Bonzelet,

(9th Cir. 2 | 1992) and finds that dismissal is appropriate. 3 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 4 1. The findings and recommendations filed March 17, 2025 are adopted in full; 5 2. The complaint is dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute; and 6 3. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the case. 7 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. 9 | Dated: _May 30, 2025 Donal J CL bratter— Hon. Daniel alabretta 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28