1

2

3

4 JS-6

5

6

7

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

11 ARGISHTI TIGRANYAN, Case No. 2:24-cv-00741-SPG-RAO

12 Plaintiff, JUDGMENT 13 v. 14 MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE 15 UNITED STATES, et al., 16 Defendant. 17

18 Upon review of the Joint Briefing on Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment 19 (ECF No. 35) and consideration of the parties’ briefs and arguments, the Court found that 20 application of the “TRAC factors,” as set forth in Telecommunications Research & Action 21 Center v. FCC,

, 80 (D.C. Cir. 1984) weighed in favor of Defendants, the delay 22 in adjudicating Plaintiff’s asylum application was not unreasonable, and granting 23 summary judgment to Defendants is appropriate. This Court thus granted summary 24 judgment for Defendants and awarded no relief to Plaintiff. 25 // 26 // 27 // 1 For all the foregoing reasons, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that JUDGMENT is 2 || entered in favor of Defendants. The Clerk is directed to close this case. 3 Ye 4 || Dated: June 3, 2025 AO 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28