(PS) Whitaker v. Solano Supreme Court
(PS) Whitaker v. Solano Supreme Court
Trial Court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 EDWARD C. WHITAKER, No. 2:25-cv-1044-TLN-CKD PS 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 SOLANO SUPERIOR COURT, et. al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is proceeding in this action pro se and in forma pauperis. This proceeding was 18 referred to this court by Local Rule 302(c)(21). 19 On April 15, 2025, the undersigned issued an order dismissing plaintiff’s complaint for 20 failure to state a valid claim for relief. Plaintiff was granted leave to file an amended complaint 21 within thirty days. Plaintiff was advised that failure to file an amended complaint would result in 22 a recommendation of dismissal. That time has passed, and plaintiff has not filed an amended 23 complaint or otherwise responded to the court’s order. 24 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed with 25 prejudice for failure to state a claim. 26 In light of these recommendations, IT IS ALSO HEREBY ORDERED that all pleading, 27 discovery, and motion practice in this action are STAYED pending resolution of the findings and 28 recommendations. With the exception of objections to the findings and recommendations and 1 | any non-frivolous motions for emergency relief, the court will not entertain or respond to any 2 || motions and other filings until the findings and recommendations are resolved. 3 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 4 | assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within fourteen days 5 || after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections 6 || with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned “Objections 7 || to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file 8 | objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. 9 || Martinez v. YIst,
951 F.2d 1153(9th Cir. 1991). 10 | Dated: June 4, 2025 fi se / bps ANI fe fo. AG " CAROLYNK.DELANEY 12 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 13 14 15 16 whit 1044 f&r 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Reference
- Status
- Unknown