Mario Roderick Stevens v. Raymond Madden
Mario Roderick Stevens v. Raymond Madden
Trial Court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MARIO RODERICK STEVENS, Case No. 2:22-cv-06138-JWH-SSC
12 Petitioner, ORDER ACCEPTING 13 v. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF 14 RAYMOND MADDEN, Warden, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND 15 Respondent. DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY 16
17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 l Pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 636the Court has reviewed the petition, 2 | all of the records herein, and the Report and Recommendation of United 3 | States Magistrate Judge to which no objections were filed. Good cause 4 | appearing therefor, the Court hereby ORDERS as follows: 5 1. The findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge in the 6 | Report and Recommendation are ACCEPTED. 7 2. Judgment shall be entered DENYING the petition and 8 | DISMISSING this action with prejudice. 9 3. Further, the Court finds that Petitioner has not made a 10 | substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right or that the 11 | court erred in its procedural ruling and, therefore, a certificate of 12 | appealability will not issue in this action. See
28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); 13 | Fed. R. App. P. 22(b); Miller-El v. Cockrell,
537 U.S. 322, 386(2003); 14 | Slack v. McDaniel,
529 U.S. 473, 484(2000). 15 IT IS SO ORDERED. 16 17 | DATED: 6/5/2025 LLY, UZ pm 18 UNI SD SPATES DISTRICT SUDGE 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Reference
- Status
- Unknown