Miholich v. The Real Brokerage, Inc.

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA KYLE MIHOLICH, individually and on Case No.: 24-cv-01038-AGS-JLB behalf of all others similarly situated, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S Plaintiff, 13 APPLICATION TO FILE UNDER v. SEAL THE REAL BROKERAGE, INC., et al., 15 [ECF No. 66] Defendants.

19 Before the Court is Plaintiff Kyle Miholich’s (“Plaintiff”) Application to File Under Seal (“Motion to Seal”). (ECF No. 66.) Plaintiff seeks to file under seal certain documents submitted in connection with its redacted Motion to Compel Further Responses from Non- Party Lofty, Inc. to Subpoena (ECF No. 40). Given the confidential business information included in the documents, the Court finds that good cause has been established for sealing. Kamakana v. City and Cnty. of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1179 (9th Cir. 2006).

25 Good cause appearing, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff’s Motion to Seal (ECF No. 66) and DENIES AS MOOT Plaintiff’s previous Motion to Seal Documents Marked Confidential and to File Redacted Motion (ECF No. 38).

28 /// || Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to file under seal Plaintiff's unredacted ||Motion to Compel Further Responses from Non-Party Lofty, Inc. to Subpoena including || Exhibit C (TRB00001—46) and Exhibit D (TRB00166—86). (ECF No. 67.)

4 IT IS SO ORDERED.

5 ||Dated: June 5, 2025 - n. Jill L. Burkhardt 7 ited States Magistrate Judge