1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 EMILY PESSANO, individually and as Case No. 1:24-cv-01189 JLT EPG guardian ad litem for her minor daughter 12 Calliope Pessano-Maldonado, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, APPROVING 13 Plaintiffs, PETITION FOR APPROVAL OF MINOR’S COMPROMISE 14 v. (Docs. 24, 31, 42, 46, 47) 15 BLUE CROSS OF CALIFORNIA, ORDER DISMISSING THE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE BASED UPON THE 16 Defendant. STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES (Doc. 48) 17 18 Plaintiffs sought to compel Blue Cross of California to pay air ambulance transportation 19 costs for minor plaintiff Calliope Pessano-Maldonado under an insurance policy. Following a 20 settlement, Plaintiffs filed a petition for approval of the minor’s compromise, which they later 21 supplemented. (Docs. 24, 31, 42.) The magistrate judge found the proposed settlement was fair 22 and reasonable, and in the best interests of the minor plaintiff. (Doc. 46 at 4-6 [under seal]; Doc. 23 47 at 4-6.) The magistrate judge recommended the Court approve the petition and direct: (1) 24 Defendants to pay the settlement amount within 30 days, (2) Plaintiffs to pay the identified 25 amount for air ambulance services following their receipt of the settlement funds, and (3) the 26 parties to file a joint stipulation for dismissal within 7 days of the settlement payment. (Id. at 6-7; 27 Doc. 47 at 6-7.) 28 The Court served the Findings and Recommendations on all parties and notified them 1 | that any objections were due within fourteen 14 days. (Doc. 47 at 7.) The Court also informed 2 || the parties “that failure to file objections within the specified time may result in the waiver of 3 | rights on appeal.” (/d., citing Wilkerson v. Wheeler,

(9th Cir. 2014).) No 4 | party has filed objections, and the time in which to do so has passed. However, as contemplated 5 | by the terms of the settlement, the parties filed a joint stipulation for dismissal with prejudice 6 | pursuant to Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Doc. 48.) 7 According to

(b)(1), this Court performed a de novo review of the case. 8 | Having carefully reviewed the entire matter, the Court concludes the Findings and 9 | Recommendations are supported by the record and proper analysis. Thus, the Court ORDERS: 10 1. The Findings and Recommendations issued on May 16, 2025 (Docs. 46, 47) are 11 ADOPTED in full. 12 2. The petition for approval of minor’s compromise (Docs. 24, 31, 42) is APPROVED. 13 3. Defendant SHALL pay the settlement amount within 30 days of this order. 14 4. Plaintiffs SHALL pay REACH’s bill within thirty days of receipt of the settlement 15 amount from Defendant. 16 5. The remainder of the settlement, after REACH’s bill is paid, SHALL be used to pay 17 for Plaintiffs’ attorneys fees and costs. 18 6. Neither Plaintiff is entitled to, nor will receive, any monetary compensation after 19 REACH’s bill and attorney fees and costs are paid. 20 7. Based upon the joint stipulation of the parties (Doc. 48), the action is DISMISSED 21 with prejudice. 22 8. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: _ June 12, 2025 Charis [Tourn TED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 26 27 28