1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JACOBY T. JACKSON, Case No. 1:25-cv-0348 JLT SAB (HC) 12 Petitioner, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, DISMISSING THE 13 v. PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS AS DUPLICATIVE, AND 14 CALIFORNIA, DIRECTING THE CLERK OF COURT TO CLOSE THE CASE 15 Respondent. (Doc. 7) 16 17 Jacoby T. Jackson is a state prisoner proceeding with a petition for writ of habeas corpus 18 pursuant to

, seeking to challenge his 2023 convictions for murder, arson, and 19 vehicle theft. The magistrate judge performed a preliminary review pursuant to Rule 4 of the 20 Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases and found the petition is duplicative of a petition currently 21 pending in Jackson v. Tulare County, Case No. 1:25-cv-00257-SAB. (Doc. 7 at 2-3.) The 22 magistrate judge declined to construe the current petition as an amendment to the petition in Case. 23 No. 1:25-cv-00257 because Petitioner did “not attempt to raise new claims” and made “fewer 24 factual allegations than the petition currently pending in the previously filed case.” (Id. at 2-3.) 25 Thus, the magistrate judge recommended this petition be dismissed as duplicative. (Id. at 3.) 26 The Court served the Findings and Recommendations on Petitioner and notified him that 27 any objections were due within 30 days. (Doc. 7 at 3.) The Court advised him that the “failure to 28 file any objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s 1 order.” (d., citing Wilkerson v. Wheeler,

(9th Cir. 2014).) Petitioner did 2 | not file objections, and the time to do so has passed. 3 According to

(b)(1), this Court performed a de novo review of this case. 4 | Having carefully reviewed the matter, the Court concludes the Findings and Recommendations 5 || are supported by the record and proper analysis. Thus, the Court ORDERS: 6 1. The Findings and Recommendations issued on April 25, 2025 (Doc. 7) are 7 ADOPTED in full. 8 2. The petition for writ of habeas corpus is DISMISSED as duplicative. 9 3. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. 10 IT IS SO ORDERED. 12 Dated: _ June 12, 2025 Cerin | Tower TED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28