Acosta v. Rashed
Acosta v. Rashed
Trial Court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ? || JOSE ACOSTA, 10 Case No. 1:25-cv-00481-EPG Plaintiff, ll ORDER RE: NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY v. DISMISSAL OF ACTION WITH PREJUDICE 12 YAHYA A. RASHED, et al., (ECF No. 8) 13 Defendants. 14 15 On June 11, 2025, Plaintiff filed a notice voluntarily dismissing this action with 16 prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)@). (ECF No. 8). Therefore, 17 |) this action has been dismissed with prejudice. Wilson v. City of San Jose,
111 F.3d 688, 692 18 (9th Cir. 1997). Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate all 19 pending deadlines and proceedings and then close the case. 20 91 IS SO ORDERED. |! Dated: _ June 12, 2025 [Jee ey —— 23 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 24 25 26 27 28
Reference
- Status
- Unknown