1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MICHAEL ANTHONY ADKINS, No. 2:25-cv-1200-SCR 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER AND FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS 14 CALIFORNIA SUBSTANCE ABUSE TREATMENT FACILITY AND STATE 15 PRISON, 16 Defendant. 17 18 By order filed April 28, 2025, plaintiff was granted thirty days to file a complaint and an 19 application to proceed in forma pauperis in order to properly initiate a civil action in this court. 20 Thirty days from that date have now passed, and plaintiff has not filed the required pleadings, or 21 otherwise responded to the court’s order. 22 In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is 23 directed to assign a district judge to this case; and 24 IT IS RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 25 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 26 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 27 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of

(b)(l). Within twenty one days 28 after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections 1 | with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 2 || “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that 3 || failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District 4 | Court’s order. Martinez v. YIst,

(9th Cir. 1991). 5 || DATED: June 12, 2025 6

8 SEAN C. RIORDAN 9 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 10 1] 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28