Jesus Vargas v. Lockheed Martin Corporation

O United States District Court Central District of California JESUS VARGAS. Case № 2:25-cv-04288-ODW (PVCx) 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER DENYING MOTION TO THE BOEING COMPANY et al., DISMISS AS MOOT [15] 15 Defendants.

17 /// /// /// /// /// /// /// /// /// /// /// 1 On June 3, 2025, Defendant The Boeing Company served Plaintiff Jesus Vargas || with a Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss the First Amended || Complaint in this case. (ECF No. 15.) On June 16, 2025, pursuant to the stipulation 4|| of the parties and the Court’s leave, Plaintiff filed a Second Amended Complaint.

5 || (ECF No. 19.) Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(2) allows plaintiffs to file an || amended complaint with the opposing party’s written consent or the court’s leave.

7|| Therefore, Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint was proper. As the pending | motion to dismiss is based on a pleading that is no longer operative, the motion is DENIED as MOOT. (ECF No. 15); see Ramirez v. County of San Bernardino, | 806 F.3d 1002, 1008 (9th Cir. 2015).

12 IT IS SO ORDERED.

14 June 17, 2025 15 es 7 OTIS D. WRIGHT, II ig UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE