(PC) Darbouze v. Spencer

8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA JEAN-MAX DARBOUZE, Case No. 2:23-cv-1419 WBS CSK P Plaintiff, [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING 13 DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR v. EXTENSION OF TIME TO COMPLETE 14 DISCOVERY AND REVISED SCHEDULING ORDER SPENCER, et al., 16 Defendants.

18 Plaintiff is a state inmate proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Defendants J. Spencer, Ph.D. and Dr. R. Kim move to extend time to complete fact discovery by approximately thirty days, up to and including August 6, 2025, and to extend the deadline for the parties to file any motions necessary to compel discovery by that date. (ECF No. 58.) As set forth below, the Court finds good cause for the requested extension and grants defendants’ request.

24 I. BACKGROUND 25 Plaintiff alleges that while he was housed at High Desert State Prison defendants Dr. Spencer and Dr. Kim were deliberately indifferent to plaintiff’s serious mental health and medical needs. (ECF No. 1.) Defendant Spencer filed an answer on October 16, 2024. (ECF No. 37.) A discovery and scheduling order issued on November 13, 2024; the discovery deadline was set for March 7, 2025, and the pretrial motions deadline was set for May 30, 2025. (ECF No. 41.)

3 Due to difficulties in clarifying defendant Kim’s true name, service of process on defendant Kim case was delayed. Defendant Kim waived service on January 17, 2025. (ECF No. 48.) On February 19, 2025, defendant Kim filed a motion to dismiss plaintiff’s official capacity claims. (ECF No. 49.) This Court recommended the motion be granted, and on April 28, 2025, the district court adopted the findings and recommendations in full and dismissed plaintiff’s claims against defendant Kim in his official capacity. (ECF Nos. 51, 55.)

9 In addition, defendant Kim sought a first extension of the discovery and pretrial motions deadlines. On March 5, 2025, the extension was granted, and the discovery deadline was extended to July 7, 2025, and the pretrial motions deadline was extended to September 29, 2025.

12 (ECF No. 50.)

13 Defendant Kim filed an answer on May 12, 2025. (ECF No. 57.)

14 Defendant Spencer now files a first motion to extend the discovery and pretrial motions deadline, and this is defendant Kim’s second request. (ECF No. 58.) Due to the late service on defendant Kim, defendant Kim has not had an opportunity to receive discovery responses because they are not due until July 10, 2025, and the discovery deadline expires three days later. (Id. at 3.) In addition, despite their diligence, defendants have been unable to complete plaintiff’s deposition due to staff constraints and time restraints at Mule Creek State Prison. (Id.) Defendants have noticed plaintiff’s continued deposition for June 25, 2025, and aver that the deposition may reveal witnesses or documents requiring additional discovery. (Id.) II. GOVERNING STANDARDS 23 “The district court is given broad discretion in supervising the pretrial phase of litigation.”

24 Johnson v. Mammoth Recreations, Inc., 975 F.2d 604, 607 (9th Cir. 1992) (citation and internal quotation marks omitted). Rule 16(b) provides that “[a] schedule may be modified only for good cause and with the judge’s consent.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b)(4). “The schedule may be modified ‘if it cannot reasonably be met despite the diligence of the party seeking the extension.’”

1 |} Zivkovic v. Southern California Edison Co., 302 F.3d 1080, 1087 (9th Cir. 2002) (quoting | Johnson, 975 F.2d at 607).

Ill. DISCUSSION 4 The Court finds that defendants have been diligent in conducting discovery and have || shown good cause to extend the discovery deadline. The July 7, 2025 discovery deadline is || extended to August 6, 2025. Defendants did not seek an extension of the pretrial motions || deadline, currently set for September 29, 2025.

8 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 9 1. Defendants’ motion for extension of time (ECF No. 58) is granted. The discovery || deadline is extended to August 6, 2025, as follows: (a) the period of time for the parties to || complete fact discovery is extended by thirty days, up to and including August 6, 2025; and || (b) the period of time for the parties to file any motions necessary to compel discovery is || extended by thirty days, up to and including August 6, 2025.

14 2. The pretrial motions deadline remains September 29, 2025.

15 3. In all other respects, the Discovery and Scheduling Order (ECF No. 41) remains in || effect.

18 | Dated: June 17, 2025 A aA 19 Aan Spe | CHI SOO KIM 20 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE /1/darb1419.16b2