1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 REED TIMMER, Case No. 25-cv-01547-SI

8 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING RENEWED EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR ORDER 9 v. AUTHORIZING ALTERNATIVE MEANS OF SERVICE AND SETTING 10 NEWS NATION NETWORK PVT. LTD., CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE FOR SEPTEMBER 19, 2025 AT 3 PM 11 Defendant. Re: Dkt. No. 17 12

13 Now before the Court is plaintiff’s renewed ex parte application for an order authorizing 14 alternative means of service. For the reasons set forth below, the application is DENIED without 15 prejudice. The Court sets a further case management conference for September 19, 2025 at 3:00 16 p.m. via zoom. 17 18 BACKGROUND 19 Plaintiff Reed Timmer filed this copyright infringement lawsuit against defendant News 20 Nation Network Pvt. Ltd. (“News Nation”) and ten Doe defendants. Timmer is a “professional and 21 intrepid videographer who travels the globe to document weather extremes” and he claims that News 22 Network has misappropriated, distributed and published his copyrighted videos depicting extreme 23 weather events. First Amend. Compl. (“FAC”) ¶¶ 11-12. The first amended complaint alleges that 24 News Nation “is a private limited company organized and existing under the laws of India[.]” Id. 25 ¶ 5. 26 On May 20, 2025, Timmer filed a corrected Ex Parte Application requesting an order 27 authorizing alternative service by email. Dkt. No. 17. Timmer’s application states that plaintiff’s 1 addresses associated with News Nation, and that counsel did not receive a response. Doniger Decl., 2 Ex. 2. 1 3 4 LEGAL STANDARD 5 The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure allow service to a party not within any United States 6 judicial district by various means, including “by any internationally agreed means of service that is 7 reasonably calculated to give notice, such as those authorized by the Hague Convention on the 8 Service Abroad of Judicial and Extrajudicial Documents[.]” Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(f)(1). The Rules also 9 state that service may occur “by other means not prohibited by international agreement, as the court 10 orders.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(f)(3). “Rule 4(f)(3) is an equal means of effecting service of process . . . 11 when the particularities and necessities of a given case require alternate service of process under 12 Rule 4(f)(3).” Rio Properties, Inc. v. Rio Intern. Interlink,

(9th Cir. 2002). 13 14 DISCUSSION 15 Timmer states that India is a signatory to the Hague Convention, which requires service 16 through India’s designated Central Authority. Renewed Ex Parte Application 4-5. See Richmond 17 Techs., Inc. v. Aumtech Bus. Sols., No. 11-CV-02460-LHK,

, at *11 (N.D. Cal. 18 July 1, 2011) (“The Hague Convention requires signatory countries to establish a Central Authority 19 to receive requests for service of documents from other countries and to serve those documents by 20 methods compatible with the internal laws of the receiving state.”). Timmer asserts that he should 21 be permitted to serve News Nation by email based upon a recent New York Times article regarding 22 1 Plaintiff’s counsel have filed a number of similar copyright infringement cases on behalf 23 of various individuals against News Nation in the Northern District of California, and counsel has filed nearly identical applications for alternative service in each case. See Hall v. News Nation 24 Network Pvt. Ltd., Case No. 25-cv-01537-WHO, Dkt. No. 16; Clement v. News Nation Network Pvt. Ltd., Case No. 25-cv-01540-WHO, Dkt. No. 12; Maxwell Olsen v. News Nation Network Pvt. Ltd., 25 Case No. 25-cv-01544-SI, Dkt. No. 14; Shelton v. News Nation Network Pvt. Ltd., Case No. 25-cv- 01546-AMO, Dkt. No. 14; Gorman v. News Nation Network Pvt. Ltd., Case No. 25-cv-01542-JSW, 26 Dkt. No. 16; Rigsby v. News Nation Network Pvt. Ltd., Case No. 25-cv-01545-HSG, Dkt. No. 13; Whittaker v. News Nation Network Pvt. Ltd., Case No. 25-cv-01548-HSG, Dkt. No. 11; Farrell v. 27 News Nation Network Pvt. Ltd., Case No. 25-cv-01541-PCP, Dkt. No. 19; Schyma v. News Nation 1 India’s judicial backlog. Timmer also asserts that he is “not required to attempt service by other 2 || means authorized by Rule 4 before submitting this application with the court.” Renewed Ex Parte 3 || Application at 3. 4 The Court concludes that Timmer’s application is premature and that he has not made an 5 adequate showing to justify alternative service at this time. Timmer has not attempted to serve News 6 || Nation through India’s Central Authority, and thus he has not developed any factual record 7 demonstrating difficulties proceeding with service through the Central Authority. Cf Rio 8 || Properties, Inc.,

(approving alternative service based upon showing of 9 numerous efforts to serve foreign defendant). Thus, the “particularities and necessities” of this case 10 || do not presently justify an alternate means of service. /d. at 1016. 11 12 CONCLUSION 5 13 For the foregoing reasons, Timmer’s application is denied without prejudice to renewal at a 14 || later date based upon a sufficient factual showing of futile attempts to serve News Nation through 3 15 the Hague Convention. 16 The Court schedules a further case management conference for September 19, 2025 at 3:00 3 17 p.m. 18 19 IT IS SO ORDERED. Sn Mle 21 Dated: July 1, 2025 SUSAN ILLSTON 22 United States District Judge 23 24 25 26 27 28