United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, 2025

Dunn v. Marclite Electrical Corporation Florida

Dunn v. Marclite Electrical Corporation Florida
United States District Court for the Eastern District of California · Decided July 15, 2025
Dunn v. Marclite Electrical Corporation Florida

Trial Court Opinion

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EMMA DUNN and ALANA DUNN, Case No. 1:25-cv-00565-JLT-BAM 12 Plaintiffs, ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFFS EMMA DUNN AND ALANA DUNN TO 13 v. SUBMIT APPLICATIONS TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS OR PAY ONE MARCLITE ELECTRICAL FILING FEE WITHIN 21 DAYS CORPORATION, et al., 15 ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT Defendants. TO FORWARD TWO IN FORMA 16 PAUPERIS APPLICATIONS 17 TWENTY-ONE DAY DEADLINE 19 Plaintiffs Emma Dunn and Alana Dunn are each proceeding pro in this action filed on May 12, 2025. Plaintiffs have not paid the $405.00 filing fee nor have they submitted applications to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915.

22 To proceed in this action, Plaintiffs must either (1) pay one $405.00 filing fee, or (2) both Plaintiffs may submit applications to proceed in forma pauperis. See Dupont v. Sterling Family Trust, No. 2:23-cv-09785-SVW-AS, 2024 WL 589880, at * 1 (C.D. Cal. Jan. 19, 2024) (noting only one filing fee needs to be paid in a multiple-plaintiff case); Darden v. Indymac Bancorp, Inc., No. CIV S-09-2970 JAM DAD PS, 2009 WL 5206637, at *1 (E.D. Cal. Dec. 23, 2009) (“Where there are multiple plaintiffs in a single action, the plaintiffs may not proceed in forma pauperis unless all of them demonstrate inability to pay the filing fee.”) Although Plaintiffs’ recently filed complaint includes statements regarding an inability to proceed in forma pauperis, it is not clear to the Court whether those statements pertain to one or both Plaintiffs. (See Doc. 7.)

4 Further, the purported financial information included in the complaint also is not sufficient for the Court to determine if each Plaintiff is entitled to proceed in forma pauperis in this action. (Id.) 6 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 7 1. The Clerk’s Office shall send to Plaintiffs two applications to proceed in forma pauperis; 9 2. Within twenty-one (21) days of the date of service of this order, Plaintiffs shall either (1) pay one $405.00 filing fee for this action; or (2) Plaintiffs Emma Dunn and Alana Dunn shall each submit one of the attached applications to proceed in forma pauperis, completed and signed; 13 3. No requests for extensions will be granted absent a showing of good cause; and 14 3. Failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation for dismissal of this action.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

18 Dated: July 15, 2025 /s/ Barbara A. McAuliffe _ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.