Integrity Medical Product Solutions, LLC v. Seroclinix Corporation

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA INTEGRITY MEDICAL PRODUCT Case No. 22-cv-0785-BAS-BLM SOLUTIONS, LLC, ORDER: Plaintiff, v. (1) GRANTING JOINT MOTION TO AMEND THIRD-PARTY SEROCLINIX CORPORATION, et al., 15 COMPLAINT (ECF No. 82); Defendants. AND 17 (2) TERMINATING AS MOOT SEROCLINIX CORPORATION, et al., MOTION TO DISMISS THIRD- PARTY COMPLAINT Third-Party Plaintiffs, 19 (ECF No. 74) v. HONU MANAGEMENT GROUP, LLC, Third-Party Defendant.

24 Seroclinix Delaware and Seroclinix Canada filed a Third-Party Complaint against Honu Management Group, LLC. (ECF No. 66.) Honu Management moved to dismiss the Third-Party Complaint on several grounds. (ECF No. 74.)

27 More recently, these parties filed a Joint Motion to Amend the Third-Party Complaint. (ECF No. 82.) Under Rule 15, a party may amend its pleading with the other || party’s written consent. Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(2). Consequently, the Court GRANTS the || Joint Motion. (ECF No. 82.) Third-Party Plaintiffs shall file their First Amended Third- Party Complaint no later than July 18, 2025. Honu Management shall respond to the ||amended pleading no later than August 1, 2025.

5 Further, in light of the amended pleading, the Court TERMINATES AS MOOT || Honu’s Motion to Dismiss the Third-Party Complaint. (ECF No. 74.) See Lacey vy.

7 || Maricopa Cnty., 693 F.3d 896, 927 (9th Cir. 2012) (en banc) (“The general rule is that an |}amended complaint [overrides] the original complaint and renders it without legal effect.”

9 || (citation modified)).

10 IT IS SO ORDERED.

11 | We ~ FE | f || DATED: July 16, 2025 Hon. Cynthia Bashant, Chief Judge 13 United States District Court