(SS) Santiago v. Commissioner of Social Security

United States District Court for the Eastern District of California

(SS) Santiago v. Commissioner of Social Security

Trial Court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 LETICIA SANTIAGO, on behalf of Case No. 1:24-cv-01391-HBK minors J.C. and R.S.B., 12 ORDER GRANTING PARTIES’ Plaintiff, STIPULATED MOTION TO REMAND 13 UNDER SENTENCE FOUR OF 42 U.S.C. § v. 405(g), REVERSING FINAL DECISION AND 14 REMANDING CASE1 COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL 15 SECURITY, (Doc. No. 21)

16 Defendant. 17 18 19 Pending before the Court is the parties’ joint motion to remand filed July 15, 2025. (Doc. 20 No. 21). Plaintiff Leticia Santiago and the Commissioner of Social Security agree that this case 21 should be remanded for further administrative proceedings under sentence four of

42 U.S.C. § 22

405(g). (Id.). 23 The United States Supreme Court held that the Social Security Act permits remand in 24 conjunction with a judgment either affirming, reversing, or modifying the Secretary’s decision. 25 See Melkonyan v. Sullivan,

501 U.S. 89, 97-98

(1991) (addressing issue of attorney’s fees under 26 1 Both parties have consented to the jurisdiction of a magistrate judge in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 27 §636(c)(1). (Doc. No. 8).

28 1 | the Equal Access to Justice Act and calculating deadline using date of final judgment). The 2 | Melkonyan court recognized

42 U.S.C. § 405

(g) contemplates only two types of remand — 3 || sentence four or sentence six. /d. at 98. A sentence four remand authorizes a court to enter “a 4 | judgment affirming, modifying, or reversing the decision of the Secretary, with or without 5 || resetting the cause for a rehearing.” Jd. (other citations omitted). 6 The Court grants the parties’ motion to remand under sentence four and reverses the 7 | Commissioner’s final decision. As agreed upon by the parties, upon remand, the Commissioner 8 | will offer Plaintiff the opportunity to submit additional evidence, further develop the record as 9 | necessary, and issue a new decision. 10 Accordingly, it is ORDERED: 11 1. Pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C.§ 405(g), the Court grants the joint motion to 12 remand (Doc. No. 21) and REVERSES the Commissioner’s decision. This case is 13 REMANDED to the Commissioner of Social Security for further proceedings 14 consistent with this Order. 15 2. A motion for attorney fees may be filed within thirty (30) days. 16 3. The Clerk shall enter judgment in favor of Plaintiff, terminate any deadlines, and close 17 this case. 18 | Dated: _ July 16, 2025 Mihaw. Wh. foareh Zaskth 20 HELENA M. BARCH-KUCHTA UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Reference

Status
Unknown