1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JIMMY FERREROSA, Case No. 1:24-cv-01242 JLT GSA (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, DISMISSING THE 13 v. ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE, AND DIRECTING THE CLERK OF COURT TO 14 K. HALL, CLOSE THE CASE 15 Defendant. (Doc. 9) 16 17 Jimmy Ferrerosa, a former state prisoner, initiated this action to hold the defendant liable 18 for violations of Plaintiff’s civil rights while in custody at Valley State Prison. (See generally 19 Doc. 1.) Although Plaintiff sought to proceed in forma pauperis, he filed only the form 20 applicable to prisoners and did not complete the Court’s general civil application. (See Doc. 2.) 21 Therefore, the Court ordered Plaintiff to complete the proper application or pay the filing fee in 22 full. (Doc. 7.) 23 After Plaintiff failed to either pay the filing fee or otherwise respond to the Court, the 24 magistrate judge found Plaintiff failed to prosecute the action and failed to comply with the 25 Court’s order. (Doc. 9 at 1-2, 5.) The magistrate judge also found terminating sanctions were 26 appropriate after considering the factors identified by the Ninth Circuit in Malone v. United States 27 Postal Service,

(9th Cir. 1987). (Id. at 2-4.) Therefore, the magistrate judge 28 recommended the Court dismiss the action without prejudice. (Id. at 5.) 1 The Court served the Findings and Recommendations on Plaintiff and notified him that 2 | any objections were due within 14 days. (Doc. 9 at 5.) The Court advised him that the “failure to 3 | file any objections within the specified time may result in the waiver of certain rights on appeal.” 4 | Ud. at 4, citing Wilkerson v. Wheeler,

(9th Cir. 2014).) Plaintiff did not file 5 || objections, and the time to do so has passed. 6 According to

(b)(1), this Court performed a de novo review of this case. 7 | Having carefully reviewed the matter, the Court concludes the Findings and Recommendations 8 || are supported by the record and proper analysis. Thus, the Court ORDERS: 9 1. The Findings and Recommendations issued June 25, 2025 (Doc. 9) are 10 ADOPTED in full. 11 2. This matter is DISMISSED without prejudice. 12 3. Plaintiff's request to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. 2) is denied as MOOT. 13 4. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case. 14 15 IT IS SO ORDERED. 16 | Dated: _ July 16, 2025 Charis [Tourn TED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28