1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RICO LYNTICE RILEY, No. 2:23-cv-01511-DAD-EFB (PC) 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 PRUDHLE, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a state inmate, proceeds without counsel in an action brought under

1983. This proceeding was referred to this court by Local Rule 302 pursuant to

636(b)(1). 20 On March 5, 2025, the court ordered plaintiff to provide additional information to serve 21 defendant Bulgary and to submit, within 30 days, documents to effect such service. ECF No. 29. 22 The court warned plaintiff that failure to timely comply with the order would result in a 23 recommendation that the district judge dismiss his claims against defendant Bulgary. 24 The time for acting has now passed and plaintiff has not complied with the court’s order. 25 Thus, it appears that plaintiff is unable or unwilling to provide sufficient information to effect 26 service on defendant Bulgary. 27 //// 28 //// ] Accordingly, it RECOMMENDED that plaintiffs claims against defendant Bulgary be 2 || DISMISSED. 3 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 4 | assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of

(b)(1). Within fourteen days 5 || after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written 6 || objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 7 || “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Any response to the 8 || objections shall be served and filed within fourteen days after service of the objections. The 9 || parties are advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to 10 || appeal the District Court’s order. Turner v. Duncan,

(9th Cir. 1998); Martinez 11 | v. Yést,

(9th Cir. 1991). 12 13 | Dated: July 17, 2025 late EDMUND F. BRENNAN 14 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28