Mohammadreza Hemmati v. Antony Blinken

United States District Court for the Central District of California

Mohammadreza Hemmati v. Antony Blinken

Trial Court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MOHAMMADREZA HEMMATI, et al., ) NO. CV 24-5620 FMO (MAAx) ) 12 Plaintiff, ) ) 13 v. ) ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITHOUT ) PREJUDICE 14 MARCO RUBIO, et al., ) ) 15 ) ) 16 Defendants. ) ) 17 18 On July 9, 2025, the court issued an Order to Show Cause why this case should not be 19 dismissed for mootness. A written response to the Order to Show Cause was ordered to be filed 20 no later than July 15, 2025. As of the filing date of this Order, no response has been filed to the 21 court’s Order to Show Cause. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the above-captioned case is 22 dismissed, without prejudice, for mootness and for failure to comply with the orders of the court, 23 pursuant to Local Rule 41. See also Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); Link v. Wabash R. Co.,

370 U.S. 626

, 24 629-30,

82 S.Ct. 1386, 1388

(1962). 25 Dated this 17th day of July, 2025. 26 /s/ 27 Fernando M. Olguin United States District Judge 28

Reference

Status
Unknown