Marchello Hill v. J. Cavagnolo
Marchello Hill v. J. Cavagnolo
Trial Court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MARCHELLO HILL, No. 2:25-cv-1703 CKD P 12 Petitioner, 13 v. ORDER 14 J. CAVAGNOLO, 15 Respondent. 16 17 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas 18 corpus pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 2254. The application attacks a conviction issued by the Superior 19 Court of Riverside County. While both this court and the United States District Court in the 20 district where petitioner was convicted have jurisdiction, see Braden v. 30th Judicial Circuit 21 Court,
410 U.S. 484(1973), any and all witnesses and evidence necessary for the resolution of 22 petitioner’s application are more readily available in Riverside County.
Id.at 499 n.15; 28 U.S.C. 23 § 2241(d). 24 ///// 25 ///// 26 ///// 27 ///// 28 ///// ] Accordingly, in the furtherance of justice, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this matter is 2 || transferred to the United States District Court for the Central District of California. 3 | Dated: June 20, 2025 Card ft 4 by ae 4 CAROLYNK. DELANEY SOS 5 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 6 7 8 fi 9 hill1 703.108
10 1] 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Reference
- Status
- Unknown