UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SOLANO-NAPA COUNTIES Case No. 24-cv-06403-AMO (AGT) ELECTRICAL WORKERS HEALTH & WELFARE TRUST, et al., REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Plaintiffs, Re: Dkt. No. 16 v.

BRAMBILA & KELLEY INC., Defendant.

The undersigned recommends that Judge Martinez-Olguin grant plaintiffs’ motion for default judgment and enter judgment for plaintiffs and against Brambila & Kelley, Inc. (“B&K”), a California corporation, for $115,888.69. * * * From June 1, 2020, through December 31, 2022, B&K underfunded trust funds that were used to pay its employees’ fringe benefits. See Dkt. 1, Compl. ¶¶ 8–12; Dkt. 16-1, Fan Decl. ¶¶ 6–11.1 By doing so, B&K breached the trust agreements and a related collective bargaining agreement and violated ERISA. See Compl. ¶¶ 11–16;

. An audit revealed that B&K owes the trust funds $115,888.69 for the period in question.

1 On a motion for default judgment, the Court accepts the plaintiffs’ factual allegations as true. Cripps v. Life Ins. Co. of N. Am.,

(9th Cir. 1992). The above total is the sum of the following amounts: $74,320.21 in unpaid contributions; $7,432.07 in liquidated damages; $8,390.41 in interest; $15,441.00 in audit costs; $9,900.00 in attorney’s fees;2 and $405.00 in legal costs.

Fan Decl. ¶¶ 11, 14–15, 19–20; Dkt. 1-3 at 8 (audit report). See generally Fan Decl., Ex. B (collection procedures). These amounts are recoverable under ERISA,

(g)(2). And as re- quired, plaintiffs’ attorney’s fees are based on a reasonable hourly rate ($225 per hour for an associate with three years of experience) and a reasonable number of hours billed (44 hours). See Fan Decl. ¶¶ 14–15; Welch v. Metro. Life Ins. Co.,

(9th Cir. 2007). The equities favor entering judgment for the amount owed, $115,888.69, in plain- tiffs’ favor and against B&K. Plaintiffs served B&K with process. See Dkt. 8 (proof of sub- stitute service on B&K at the home of B&K’s president, Juan Manuel Brambila, by leaving a copy of the summons and complaint with a competent member of the household and mail- ing another copy to the same address); Dkt. 1-1, Letter of Assent (listing “John” Brambila’s home address as an address for B&K);3 Operating Engineers’ Health & Welfare Tr. Fund

2 In their motion, plaintiffs wrote that they were seeking to recover $11,655.00 in attorneys’ fees. See Dkt. 16 at 10–11. That amount reflects a computational error. When counsel’s hourly rate ($225 per hour) is multiplied by the hours billed (44 hours), the total is $9,900.00.

3 Plaintiffs offer extensive evidence supporting that B&K’s president, Juan Manuel Bram- bila, also goes by the name “John,” his “preferred nickname.” Dkt. 20-1, Fan Supp. Decl. ¶ 4; see, e.g.,

(“John Brambila has consistently represented to me that he is an owner and the President of Defendant [B&K] and that his legal name is Juan Manuel Brambila. John Brambila has orally represented to me over the phone that John Brambila and Juan Manuel Brambila both refer to himself, and Juan was his legal name, on at least one occasion.”); id. ¶ 12 (“I compared the signatures utilized by ‘John’ Brambila on the Letter of Assent along with the signatures used by Juan Manuel Brambila on other corporate records, including an Account Agreement. The signatures appear identical.”); id. ¶¶ 5, 7, 13 (identifying records in which “John” and Juan Brambila used the same email address). for N. California v. Ag-Tech Inc., No. 18-CV-05411-PJH (JISC),

, at *4 (N.D. Cal. July 19, 2019) (“Ifa corporation’s business address is the same as the residential address for the person to be served, that address is adequate for substitute service.”), adopted,

(N.D. Cal. Oct. 11, 2019). Despite service, B&K never entered an ap- pearance. There’s no reason to believe that B&K’s failure to appear was the result of excus- able neglect. And because B&K never appeared, a decision on the merits is impossible. Plaintiffs’ allegations are also sufficient to state a plausible claim for relief. And without default judgment, plaintiffs will be left without a legal remedy. All of these factors support default judgment. See Eitel v. McCool,

(9th Cir. 1986). Plaintiffs also seek an injunction that would require B&K “to timely submit required monthly contribution reports and payments as required by the terms of the CBA and Trust Agreements.” Dkt. 16 at 2. The requested injunction “is appropriate under ERISA.” Trs. on Behalf of Teamsters Ben. Tr. v. Casey’s Off. Moving & Servs., Inc., No. C-05-4157 MHP (EMC),

, at *4 (N.D. Cal. Apr. 3, 2007). Without contribution reports, plaintiffs cannot “determine the full amount of fringe benefits owed.” Compl. § 28. By July 1, 2025, plaintiffs must serve B&K with a copy of this report and recom- mendation, by any means reasonably calculated to provide actual notice, and file proof of service. Any party may file objections to this report and recommendation within 14 days of receiving it. See

(b)(1)(C); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2). IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: June 27, 2025 Alex G. Tse United States Magistrate Judge