1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 EDWARD JAMES HARRIS ) No. EDCV 24-1306-WDK (JPR) ) 12 Petitioner, ) ORDER ACCEPTING MAGISTRATE ) JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 13 v. ) ) 14 EDWARD J. SILVA, Acting ) Warden, ) 15 ) Respondent. ) 16 17 Pursuant to

, the Court has reviewed the 18 First Amended Petition, Respondent’s motion to dismiss, 19 Petitioner’s opposition, the other records on file herein, the 20 Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (“R&R”), and 21 Petitioner’s Objections to the R&R (“Objections”). The Court has 22 reviewed de novo those identifiable portions of the R&R to which 23 Petitioner has timely and properly objected. See

636(b)(1)©; Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 25

(9th Cir. 2003) (en banc). 26 In doing so, the Court has declined to consider any 27 arguments raised for the first time only in the objections. See 28 United States v. Howell,

(9th Cir. 2000). has also declined to consider objections that simply repeat 2 |/arguments fully addressed but rejected in the R&R. See Trejo 3 || Perez v. Madden,

, at *1 (E.D. Cal. Mar. 10, 2020) 4] (objections that “merely repeat[] the same arguments .. . 5 | considered and found to be insufficient” require no review since 6 | they “do not meaningfully dispute the magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations”); Hagberg v. Astrue,

, at *1 (D. Mont. Oct. 14, 2009) (“Objections to a magistrate’s Findings and Recommendations are not a vehicle for the losing party to 10 | relitigate its case.”). Finally, the Court has declined to consider any blanket or boilerplate objection to the final 12 || disposition recommended in the R&R. See McCullock v. Tharratt, 13

, at *1 (S.D. Cal. Dec. 15, 2017). 14 Concluding that nothing in Petitioner’s Objections affects 15 | the material findings and conclusions in the R&R, the Court 16 || accepts the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge. 17 ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED THAT: 18 1. Respondent motion to dismiss is granted. 19 2. The First Amended Petition is dismissed without 20 || prejudice. 21 3. Judgment be entered consistent with this order. 22 4, The clerk serve this Order on all counsel or parties of 23 || record. 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 . Aiftcet 2 Jette 26 |) DATED: July 31, 2025 WILLIAM D. KELLER 27 U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE 28