I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 |} CLARENCE HIGHTOWER, et al., Case No.: 24-cv-1152-RSH-MSB 12 Plaintifls.) ORDER ON JOINT MOTION TO 13 || v. DISMISS 14 || COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, et al., [ECF No. 26] 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 19 On August 5, 2025, the Parties filed a Joint Motion to Dismiss. ECF No. 26. The 20 || Motion satisfies the requirements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i1) and is 21 effective on filing. See Wilson vy. City of San Jose,

, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). The 22 action, in its entirety, is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Each party is to bear 23 own fees and costs. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the case. 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 Dated: August 5, 2025 Jekut C Lowe 26 57 Hon. Robert S. Huie United States District Judge 28