I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 |} JEFFERY DAVIDSON, Case No.: 24-cv-1357-RSH-JLB 12 Plants | ORDER GRANTING JOINT 13 |] V. MOTION FOR DISMISSAL 14 || PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES, INC. et 15 al., [ECF No. 10] 16 Defendants. 17 18 19 Before the Court is the Parties’ Joint Motion to Dismiss. ECF No. 10. The joint 20 motion satisfies the requirements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i1) and 1s effective on filing. See Wilson v. City of San Jose,

, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). The action, in its entirety, is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. 73 The Clerk of Court is directed to close the case. IT IS SO ORDERED. [Dh ,¢ ou 95 Dated: August 5, 2025 Hon. Robert S. Huie 26 United States District Judge 27 28