CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL Case No. CV 25-04114-AS Date August 6, 2025 Title HigherUp Payroll LLC, WPS, Inc. v. The United States Small Business Administration, et al.

Present: The Honorable Alka Sagar, United States Magistrate Judge Alma Felix N/A Deputy Clerk Court Smart / Recorder Attorneys Present for Plaintiff: Attorneys Present for Defendants: N/A N/A

Proceedings: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE SERVICE OF PROCESS AND FAILURE TO PROSECUTE

On May 7, 2025, Plaintiff Higherup Payroll LLC, WPS, Inc. (“Plaintiff”) filed a complaint against The United States Small Business Administration and Kelly Loeffler (“Defendants”). (Dkt. No. 1). On May 8, 2025, the Clerk issued a Notice of Assignment to a U.S. Magistrate Judge and Declination of Consent (“Notice of Assignment”)1. (Dkt. No. 2). Though it is Plaintiff’s responsibility to prosecute this action diligently, Plaintiff has declined to further prosecute the action, including by filing a request for Clerk to Issue Summons.

More than ninety days have passed since Plaintiff filed the complaint. Yet Plaintiff has not served either Defendant. Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides that if service of the summons and complaint is not made upon a defendant within ninety days of filing the complaint, “the court—on motion or on its own after notice to the plaintiff—must dismiss the action without prejudice against that defendant or order that service be made within a specified time.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). If the plaintiff, however, “shows good cause for the failure, the court must extend the time for service for an appropriate period.” Id.

1 Among other things, the Notice of Assignment advises that this case has been assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar for all purposes and that any party may decline to consent to that assignment according to the schedule set forth for such declination. (Dkt. No. 2). Pursuant to Central District of California Local Civil Rule (“Local Rule”) 73-2.1, Plaintiff is required to serve the Notice of Assignment on each newly-served party or party added to the case at the time of service of the summons and compliant or other case-initiating document. See Local Rule 73-2.1. The period for a newly-served party or party added to decline consent begins to run upon service of the Notice. Id. CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL Case No. CV 25-04114-AS Date August 6, 2025 Title HigherUp Payroll LLC, WPS, Inc. v. The United States Small Business Administration, et al.

Plaintiff is therefore ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE in writing, within fourteen days of the date of this Order, why this case should not be dismissed without prejudice for failure to effectuate service and for lack of prosecution. See Henderson v. Duncan,

, 1423 (9th Cir. 1986) (holding district courts have “inherent power sua sponte to dismiss a case for lack of prosecution”) (citations omitted). Failure to timely file a written response to this Order may result in dismissal of this action for failure to effect service of process within the time specified by Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, for failure to prosecute, and/or for failure to obey a court order. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

Plaintiff is reminded that each newly served party or party added to the case must be served with the Notice of Assignment at the time of service of the summons and complaint, and Plaintiff must file a proof of service indicating that Defendant was served with the Notice of Assignment.

IT IS SO ORDERED.