(PS) T.J. v. San Joaquin County District Attorney

United States District Court for the Eastern District of California

(PS) T.J. v. San Joaquin County District Attorney

Trial Court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 T.J., 12 Plaintiff, Case No. 2:25-cv-1503-TLN-JDP (PS) 13 v. 14 SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY DISTRICT ORDER ATTORNEY, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 May 5, 2025, Plaintiff T.J. (“Plaintiff”) filed a Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order 19 requesting the Court stay state court criminal proceedings against him. (ECF No. 6.) On June 4, 20 2025, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations recommending this Court deny 21 Plaintiff’s motion. (ECF No. 11.) The findings and recommendations were served on the parties 22 and contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed 23 within fourteen days. (Id.) This deadline passed and no objections were filed. On June 20, 2025, 24 Plaintiff filed an amended complaint and a second motion for a temporary restraining order. 25 (ECF No. 12.) This second motion will be addressed in a separate order. This order solely 26 addresses the findings and recommendations filed on June 4, 2025, regarding Plaintiff’s first 27 motion for a temporary restraining order filed on May 5, 2025. (See ECF Nos. 6, 11.) 28 1 The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602

2 F.2d 207, 208

(9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. 3 See Robbins v. Carey,

481 F.3d 1143, 1147

(9th Cir. 2007) (“[D]eterminations of law by the 4 magistrate judge are reviewed de novo by both the district court and [the appellate] court[.]”). 5 Having reviewed the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by 6 the record and by the proper analysis. 7 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 8 1. The proposed findings and recommendations filed June 4, 2025, (ECF No. 11), are 9 ADOPTED; 10 2. Plaintiff’s motion for a temporary restraining order filed on May 5, 2025, (ECF No. 11 6), is DENIED; and 12 3. This action is referred back to the assigned magistrate judge for all further pretrial 13 matters. 14 Date: August 8, 2025 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Reference

Status
Unknown