1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10

11 CASEY MCCREADY, ) Case No.: 1:24-cv-1208 JLT BAM ) 12 Plaintiff, ) ORDER ADOPTING IN FULL THE FINDINGS ) AND RECOMMENDATIONS, DISMISSING THE 13 v. ) ACTION WITH PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO ) STATE A CLAIM, AND DIRECTING THE 14 WELLPATH, et al., ) CLERK OF COURT TO CLOSE THE CASE ) 15 Defendants. ) (Doc. 10) ) 16

17 Casey McCready asserts he suffered violations of his civil rights related to tuberculosis testing 18 performed at Madera County Jail. (See generally Doc. 8.) The magistrate judge screened the 19 complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a) and found Plaintiff failed to cognizable claim for a 20 violation of his rights under the Fourteenth Amendment. (Doc. 10 at 3-5.) In addition, the magistrate 21 judge found Plaintiff failed “to state a claim that he was coerced to take the testing.” (Id. at 5.) The 22 magistrate judge observed that the Court previously provided Plaintiff with the relevant legal standards, 23 and found further leave to amend was not warranted because Plaintiff failed to cure the deficiencies. 24 (Id. at 6.) Therefore, the magistrate judge recommended the Court dismissal “for failure to state a 25 cognizable claim upon which relief may be granted.” (Id.) 26 The Court served the Findings and Recommendations on Plaintiff and notified him that any 27 objections were due within 14 days. (Doc. 10 at 6.) The Court advised him that the “failure to file 28 objections within the specified time may result in the waiver of the ‘right to challenge the magistrate’s 1 || factual findings’ on appeal.” Ud., quoting Wilkerson v. Wheeler,

(9th Cir. 2 2014).) Plaintiff did not file objections, and the time to do so has passed. 3 According to

(b)(1), this Court performed a de novo review of this case. Havi 4 || carefully reviewed the matter, the Court concludes the Findings and Recommendations are supported 5 || by the record and proper analysis. Thus, the Court ORDERS: 6 1. The Findings and Recommendations dated July 21, 2025 (Doc. 10) are ADOPTED in 7 full. 8 2. The action is DISMISSED with prejudice, for failure to state a claim. 9 3. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. 10 11 || IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: _ August 12, 2025 ( LAW pA LU. wan 13 TED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28