(HC) Daniels v. Williams
(HC) Daniels v. Williams
Trial Court Opinion
8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 1] STEVE WAYNE DANIELS, No. 2:25-cv-1939 AC P 12 Petitioner, 13 Vv. ORDER 14 SIRCOYA M. WILLIAMS, 15 Respondent.
17 Petitioner has requested an extension of time to respond to file a motion for a stay under || Rhines v. Weber, 544 U.S. 269 (2005). Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 19 1. Petitioner’s request for an extension of time (ECF No. 6) is GRANTED; and 20 2. Petitioner shall have thirty days from the service of this order to file a motion for stay.
21 || DATED: August 19, 2025 ~ 22 Chthwen— Clare ALLISON CLAIRE 23 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.