1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 WALTER WILLIAMS, Case No. 24-cv-06575-NW 8 Plaintiff, ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT 9 Vv. PREJUDICE 10 C.T.F. SOLEDAD, et al., ll Defendants.

5 13 On July 8, 2025, the Court screened Plaintiff Walter Williams’ complaint and filed an 14 || order of dismissal with leave to amend. ECF No. 11. The order warned Williams that the case 3 15 || may be dismissed if he failed to file an amended complaint within 28 days. /d. at 4. After a 16 Williams sent the Court a letter asking for the status of his case on July 17, 2025, the Court re- 3 17 || mailed the order on July 19, 2025. ECF Nos. 12, 13. Williams’ deadline has now passed, and the 18 || Court has not received an amended complaint, request for extension of time, or any other 19 |} communication from Williams. Given that Williams failed to file an amended complaint, the 20 || matter is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. See WMX Techs. v. Miller,

, 21 1136 (9th Cir. 1997) (holding that further action by district court is necessary where plaintiff fails 22 || to amend after dismissal with leave to amend). Any motion to reopen the case must be 23 || accompanied by an amended complaint. 24 The Clerk shall close the file. 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. 26 Dated: September 3, 2025 , 27 Mi hid Noél Wise 28 United States District Judge