1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 RONNIE LYNN BRIGGS, Case No. 25-cv-04422-EMC

8 Plaintiff, ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT 9 v. PREJUDICE

10 ALEXANDER CORVIZICY, Defendant. 11

12 13 On May 23, 2025, Plaintiff Ronnie Lynn Briggs filed a pro se prisoner complaint under 14

. On the same day the action was filed, the Court sent a notification to Briggs 15 informing him that his action could not go forward until he paid the filing fee or filed a completed 16 prisoner’s in forma pauperis (IFP) application. ECF No. 2. On July 18, 2025, the Court’s 17 correspondence regarding the filing fee was returned to as undeliverable. ECF No. 3. More than 18 twenty-eight days have passed and Plaintiff has not paid the filing fee, file an in forma pauperis 19 application, or otherwise communicated with the Court. Given that Briggs failed to pay the filing 20 fee, file an IFP application, or comply with Civil Local Rule 3-11, the matter is DISMISSED 21 WITHOUT PREJUDICE. See Carey v. King,

(9th Cir. 1988) (affirming 22 dismissal of pro se prisoner’s complaint for failing to notify court of his change of address). Any 23 motion to reopen this matter must be accompanied by a change of address form and the filing fee or 24 an IFP application. The Clerk shall close the file. 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. 26 Dated: September 17, 2025 27 EDWARD M. CHEN