Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 35.151.47.128
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 35.151.47.128
Trial Court Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC, Case No. 25-cv-07532-EMC
8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S EX 9 v. PARTE APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO SERVE THIRD-PARTY 10 JOHN DOE SUBSCRIBER ASSIGNED IP SUBPOENA ADDRESS 35.151.47.128, 11 Defendant. Docket No. 7 12 13 14 Plaintiff Strike 3 Holdings, LLC has sued Defendant John Doe for copyright infringement. 15 According to Strike 3, John Doe has infringed 31 of Strike 3’s adult motion pictures using 16 BitTorrent protocol. Currently pending before the Court is Strike 3’s ex parte application for leave 17 to serve a third-party subpoena prior to a Rule 26(f) conference. 18 The Court has reviewed the application, the supporting declarations, and the complaint. 19 Based on these materials, the Court finds Strike 3 has sufficiently established that it is entitled to 20 the early discovery requested which will enable it to determine the true name and address of John 21 Doe. The Court, however, takes this opportunity to endorse the decision of Judge Seeborg in 22 Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe, No. 23-cv-04339-RS,
2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 169496(N.D. Cal. 23 Sept. 22, 2023). This Court’s rulings below are consistent with Judge Seeborg’s decision. 24 Finally, the Court notes that, although it is authorizing Strike 3 to take the discovery 25 requested, it is not precluding John Doe from filing a 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss nor is it 26 prejudging any such motion. The Court also advises Strike 3 that, upon obtaining the name and 27 address of John Doe, it has a Rule 11 obligation to determine whether to proceed with the lawsuit 1 Gonzales,
901 F.3d 1142, 1144(9th Cir. 2018) (stating that “a bare allegation that a defendant is 2 the registered subscriber of an Internet Protocol (‘IP’) address associated with infringing activity is 3 [in]sufficient to state a claim for direct or contributory infringement”). 4 Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 5 1. Strike 3 has established that good cause exists to serve a third-party subpoena on 6 Spectrum (the “ISP”). Its motion is therefore granted. 7 2. Strike 3 may serve the ISP with a Rule 45 subpoena commanding the ISP to 8 provide Strike 3 with the true name and address of John Doe to whom the ISP assigned an IP 9 address as set forth in Exhibit A to the Complaint. Strike 3 shall attach a copy of this Order to any 10 such subpoena and a copy of Judge Seeborg’s decision. 11 3. If the ISP qualifies as a “cable operator,” as defined by
47 U.S.C. § 522(5), then it 12 shall comply with
47 U.S.C. § 551(c)(2)(B) by sending a copy of this Order to John Doe. 13 4. Strike 3 shall also request the ISP forward a copy of this Order to the subscriber, 14 regardless of whether the ISP qualifies as a cable operator. If the ISP declines, Strike 3 shall serve 15 a copy of this Order on John Doe simultaneous to or before any other service or communication to 16 John Doe. Strike 3 must file a copy of its request to the ISP on the docket. As an alternative to 17 the other requirements in this paragraph, Strike 3 may file an affidavit that attests that the ISP has 18 forwarded this Order to John Doe before Strike 3 attempts to serve or communicate with John 19 Doe. 20 5. Strike 3 may only use the information disclosed in response to a Rule 45 subpoena 21 served on the ISP for the purpose of protecting and enforcing Strike 3’s rights as set forth in its 22 Complaint. Specifically, Strike 3 must not publicly disclose the information obtained based on 23 this subpoena without leave of the Court – at least until John Doe has had an opportunity to file a 24 motion to proceed anonymously, or further discovery has been taken. All references to John 25 Doe’s identity must be redacted and filed under seal until further notice. 26 6. Strike 3 must first file an affidavit confirming it proposed confidentiality to John 27 Doe, as it has represented it would. This filing must contain the relevant communications 1 descriptions of conversations with Defendant. 2 7. Spectrum, and/or any other ISP that receives a subpoena pursuant to this Order, 3 must preserve any subpoenaed information pending the resolution of any timely filed motion to 4 || dismiss. 5 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. 7 8 Dated: September 24, 2025 9 10 ED I United States District Judge 12
13
15
16
17
Z 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Reference
- Status
- Unknown