1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 KAMANI COURVOISIER STELLY, Case No. 25-cv-01975-JSC 8 Plaintiff, ORDER OF DISMISSAL 9 v. 10 MARTINEZ DETENTION FACILITY, ll Defendant. 12 On July 18, 2025, the Court dismissed Plaintiff's civil rights complaint for failure to 13 || present a cognizable claim for relief. (ECF No. 9.) Plaintiff was granted 28 days to file an 14 || amended complaint and warned that if he did not do so the case would be dismissed. He has not 3 15 || filed an amended complaint, requested an extension of time, or shown cause why not.! This case a 16 || is accordingly DISMISSED with prejudice. See WMX Technologies v. Miller,

, 3 17 1136 (9th Cir. 1997) (when complaint has been dismissed with leave to amend and plaintiff does 18 not amend, further district court determination is necessary). 19 The Clerk shall enter judgment and close the file. 20 IT IS SO ORDERED. 21 Dated: October 10, 2025 22

JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLE 24 United States District Judge 25 26 27 ' Plaintiff filed a notice of change of address on August 4, 2025. On September 3, 2025, the Clerk 28 respond. the order of dismissal with leave to amend to Plaintiff at his new address, but he did not