Tara Amber Dolan v. Frank Bisignano, Commissioner of Social Security
Trial Court Opinion
8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA TARA AMBER DOLAN, Case No. 2:24-cv-1617-DJC-JDP (SS) 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER FRANK BISIGNANO, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.
18 This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 19 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On August 13, 2025, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. No objections were filed.
23 The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The Magistrate Judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007) (“[D]eterminations of law by the magistrate judge are reviewed de novo by both the district court and [the appellate] court . . . .”). Having reviewed the file, the Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the proper || analysis.
2 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 3 1. The proposed Findings and Recommendations filed August 13, 2025, are 4 ADOPTED; 5 2. Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment, ECF No. 13, is GRANTED; 6 3. The Commissioner's cross-motion for summary judgment, ECF No. 16, is 7 DENIED; 8 4. The matter is remanded for further proceedings; and 9 5. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in plaintiff's favor and close 10 this case.
12 IT IS SO ORDERED.
13 | Dated: _September 5, 2025 “Daal J CoO □□□□ Hon. Daniel alabretta 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.