1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MARIE RUTLEDGE, No. 2:25-cv-00213-DAD-AC 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER DENYING PARTIES’ REQUEST TO ENTER JUDGMENT AND DIRECTING 14 FCA US LLC, PARTIES TO COMPLY WITH REQUIREMENTS OF FEDERAL RULE OF 15 Defendant. CIVIL PROCEDURE 68 16 (Doc. No. 12) 17 18 19 On June 16, 2025, the parties in this action filed a notice of settlement representing to the 20 court that they would seek an entry of judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 68. 21 (Doc. No. 8.) On September 9, 2025, the parties finally filed a joint stipulation in which they 22 stated that plaintiff had “accepted Defendant FCA US LLC’s Offer of Judgment.” (Doc. No. 12.) 23 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 68 provides that judgment must be entered after “either party . . . 24 file[s] an offer and notice of acceptance, plus proof of service.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 68(a). The court 25 has reviewed the docket and has been unable to locate a filing from either party which includes 26 the purported Rule 68 offer or a notice of acceptance of that offer. Federal Rule of Civil 27 Procedure 68 “was designed to function in a mechanical manner[,]” and accordingly the court 28 cannot enter judgment where no offer of judgment or notice of acceptance is before it. Kubiak v. 1 County of Ravalli,

(9th Cir. 2022); see generally Eaton v. FCA US, LLC, No. 2 | 5:23-cv-01707-SRM-KS,

, at *1—2 (C.D. Cal. June 24, 2025) (declining to 3 || enter judgment where the parties failed to submit a proposed judgment under Federal Rule of 4 | Civil Procedure 68 along with other procedural failures). 5 Accordingly, the court DENIES the parties’ joint request that the court enter judgment 6 | pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 68, but does so without prejudice. The court 7 | DIRECTS the parties in the anticipated request to enter judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of 8 | Civil Procedure 68, which the court directs be filed within 14 days of the date of this order, to 9 | comply with the requirements of Rule 68(a). 10 IT IS SO ORDERED. ' | pated: _ September 10, 2025 Dak A. 2, □□□ 12 DALE A. DROZD 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28