Sunshine Evergreen, Inc. v. Cosco Shipping Lines Co. Ltd., et al.
Sunshine Evergreen, Inc. v. Cosco Shipping Lines Co. Ltd., et al.
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL
Case No.: 2:25-cv-04000-AB-MAA Date: October 15, 2025
Title: Sunshine Evergreen, Inc. v. Cosco Shipping Lines Co. Ltd., et al.
Present: The Honorable ANDRÉ BIROTTE JR., United States District Judge
Evelyn Chun N/A
Deputy Clerk Court Reporter
Attorney(s) Present for Plaintiff(s): Attorney(s) Present for Defendant(s):
None Appearing None Appearing
Proceedings: [In Chambers] Order To Show Cause Re: Dismissal for Lack of Prosecution
Plaintiff(s) are ORDERED to show cause why this case should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Link v. Wabash R. Co.,
370 U.S. 626(1962) (Court has inherent power to dismiss for lack of prosecution on its own motion).
The below time period(s) has not been met. Accordingly, the Court, on its own motion, orders Plaintiff(s) to show cause, in writing, on or before October 29, 2025, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. This matter will stand submitted upon the filing of Plaintiff(s) response. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 78. Failure to respond will be deemed consent to the dismissal of the action.
☒ Plaintiff obtained entry of default as to Defendant Cosco Shipping Lines Co., Ltd., pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a), but Plaintiff has not sought default judgment, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(b). Plaintiff can satisfy this order by seeking default judgment or by notifying the Court that default judgment will not be sought, at which point the clerk will close this matter. IT IS SO ORDERED.
Reference
- Status
- Unknown