1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JAMES CURTIS KERN, No. 2:24-cv-0736 DJC CKD P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 HA, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42

. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant 19 to

(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On July 14, 2025, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations 21 herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that 22 any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen 23 days. Neither party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. 24 The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United 25 States,

(9th Cir. 1979). The Magistrate Judge’s conclusions of law 26 are reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist.,

, 454 27 (9th Cir. 1983). Having reviewed the file, the Court finds the findings and 28 recommendations to be supported by the record and by the Magistrate Judge’s 1 | analysis. 2 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 3 1. The findings and recommendations filed July 14, 2025, are adopted in full; 4 2. Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 31) is denied; and 5 3. This matter is referred back to the assigned Magistrate Judge for all further 6 pretrial proceedings. 7 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. 9 | Dated: _ September 12, 2025 “Dane J CoO □□□□ Hon. Daniel alabretta 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28