United States District Court for the Southern District of California, 2025

Pajman Mohadjer A.K.A Pejman Mohajer v. Kristi Noem, Secretary of the...

Pajman Mohadjer A.K.A Pejman Mohajer v. Kristi Noem, Secretary of the...
United States District Court for the Southern District of California · Decided October 27, 2025
Pajman Mohadjer A.K.A Pejman Mohajer v. Kristi Noem, Secretary of the...

Trial Court Opinion

6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA PAJMAN MOHADJER A.K.A Case No.: 3:25-cv-02409-CAB-AHG PEJMAN MOHAJER, Petitioner, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO 11 SEAL AND REQUIRING RESPONSE v. TO MOTION FOR TEMPORARY KRISTI NOEM, Secretary of the RESTRAINING ORDER Department of Homeland Security; PAMELA JO BONDI, Attorney General; TODD M. LYONS, Acting Director, Immigration and Customs Enforcement; [Doc. Nos. 10–12] JESUS ROCHA, Acting Field Office Director, San Diego Field Office; and CHRISTOPHER LAROSE, Warden at Otay Mesa Detention Center.

Respondents.

22 Petitioner has moved to seal materials attached to his original pro se habeas petition and to the government’s response because he asserts the documents include sensitive information, including sensitive health information and information that may impact his safety in custody. [Doc. No. 11.] Respondents do not oppose. [Id.] “[P]rotecting an individual’s constitutional and statutory right to privacy is a compelling interest that may justify sealing a particular medical or health record.” Civil Beat Law Ctr. For Pub. Interest, Inc. v. Maile, 117 F.4th 1200, 1210 (9th Cir. 2024). Additionally, ensuring Petitioner’s safety in custody is a compelling interest. See United States v. Doe, 870 F.3d 991 (9th Cir. |}2017).

3 The Court ORDERS the following previously filed material sealed: 4 e Doc. No. 1, Exhibits A (4-9); Exhibit B (1-9); and Exhibit C (1-8) 5 e Doc. No. 4, Exhibit 1 ||The Court additionally GRANTS Petitioner’s motion to file his unredacted second || declaration under seal. [Doc. No. 12.]

8 Petitioner has also filed a First Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, [Doc.

9 9], and a Motion for Temporary Restraining Order (“TRO”), [Doc. No. 10].

10 || Respondents shall file a response to the TRO by November 3, 2025. Petitioner may, but |/is not required to, file a traverse in support of his petition by November 6, 2025.

12 It is SO ORDERED.

13 ||Dated: October 27, 2025 (GB Hon. Cathy Ann Bencivengo 15 United States District Judge

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.