Daniel J. Forgan v. Tuolumne County Jail, et al.
Daniel J. Forgan v. Tuolumne County Jail, et al.
Trial Court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DANIEL J. FORGAN, Case No. 2:25-cv-1325-JDP (P) 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE 14 TUOLUMNE COUNTY JAIL, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 On August 5, 2025, I screened plaintiff’s complaint and notified him that it did not state a 18 claim. ECF No. 9. I ordered him to file, within thirty days, either an amended complaint or a 19 voluntary notice of dismissal. Id. The deadline has passed without word from plaintiff. 20 The court has the inherent power to control its docket and may, in the exercise of that 21 power, impose sanctions where appropriate, including dismissal. Bautista v. Los Angeles Cnty., 22
216 F.3d 837, 841 (9th Cir. 2000); see Local Rule 110 (“Failure of counsel or of a party to 23 comply with these Rules or with any order of the Court may be grounds for imposition by the 24 Court of any and all sanctions . . . within the inherent power of the Court.”). A court may dismiss 25 an action based on a party’s failure to prosecute an action, failure to obey a court order, or failure 26 to comply with local rules. See Henderson v. Duncan,
779 F.2d 1421, 1424 (9th Cir. 1986) 27 (dismissal for lack of prosecution and failure to comply with local rules). 28 I will give plaintiff a chance to explain why the court should not dismiss the case for his 1 | failure to comply with the August 5 order. Plaintiff's failure to respond to this order will 2 | constitute a failure to comply with a court order and will result in a recommendation that this 3 | action be dismissed. Accordingly, plaintiff is ordered to show cause within twenty-one days why 4 | this case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute, failure to comply with court orders, and 5 | failure to state a claim. Should plaintiff wish to continue with this lawsuit, he shall file, within 6 || twenty-one days, an amended complaint, or a notice of voluntary dismissal. 7 g IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: _ September 23, 2025 Q————. 10 JEREMY D. PETERSON i UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Reference
- Status
- Unknown