1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MARTIN LEE FOSTER, No. 2:25-cv-1755 DAD CSK P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 WILLIAM B. SHUBB, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is a county prisoner, proceeding without counsel, with a civil rights action 18 pursuant to

. By an order filed August 18, 2025, plaintiff was granted thirty 19 days to file a completed in forma pauperis affidavit and a certified copy of his jail trust account 20 statement and was cautioned that failure to do so would result in a recommendation that this 21 action be dismissed. (ECF No. 7.) The thirty day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not 22 responded to the court’s order and has not filed the required documents. 23 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without 24 prejudice. 25 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 26 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of

(b)(l). Within fourteen days 27 after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections 28 with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 1 | “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that 2 || failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District 3 || Court’s order. Martinez v. YIst,

(9th Cir. 1991). 4 5 || Dated: September 24, 2025 □□□ Spo | CHI SOO KIM 7 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 8 9 10 |] Fost1755.fifp/2 1] 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28